by Linda R. Wolf Jones, D.S.W.
In the Winter 99 issue of this newsletter, I made a number of predictions about legislative proposals that I anticipated would reappear on the congressional agenda in 1999. Legislative proposals in that category included consumer protections and patients bills of rights, substance abuse parity, and Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) reauthorization. With respect to the FY 00 appropriations process, I also suggested that prevention and treatment advocates would be concerned about the prospects for holding onto the broad-based FY 99 appropriations increases for substance abuse programs. Where are we now, a few months down the road, on these issues?
There will undoubtedly be changes in the bill as it continues through the legislative process in both houses of Congress. At this point, it appears likely that if enacted, the legislation will contain provisions governing the confidentiality of records and the right of the consumer to be told about all treatment options, but will not specify that doctors (rather than health insurers) would be the definers of "medical necessity."
It now appears that if a substance abuse parity bill is introduced, it would contain treatment limitations that were not found in the bills introduced in the 105th Congress. If that were to happen, the bill would probably not command the unified support of the substance abuse community.
Senator Domenici (R-NM), who is a strong advocate of mental health parity, introduced a bill in mid-April that would strengthen health insurance coverage for mental illnesses. That bill, however, only addresses coverage for severe biologically based mental illnesses and mental health benefits generally. Substance abuse treatment is not included among its provisions.
Also in April, a bill covering mental health and substance abuse benefits was introduced by Representative Roukema (R-NJ) with 22 co-sponsors.
The bill includes provisions for the repeal of a number of the set-asides in the substance abuse block grant, such as the requirements that states spend 35 percent of their allotment on alcohol related activities and 35 percent on drug related activities and that they maintain a revolving fund of $100,000 to support group homes. It also allows states to request a waiver from other program requirements that must currently be met for receipt of block grant funds in an effort to give states greater flexibility in their use of the funds.
Growing time pressures in Congress have diminished the chance of passage for many of this years pending legislative items. Given the potential controversies surrounding and complicating the SAMHSA reauthorization bill, it remains questionable whether we will see its enactment this year.
FY 00 Appropriations
The Administrations proposals for FY 00 contain both positives and negatives. The Presidents budget recommends a $30 million increase for the substance abuse block grant, $55 million increase for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT), $26 million decrease for the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP), and $15 million increase for the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
Advocates from the substance abuse community are calling for substantially larger, across-the-board increases over FY 99 funding levels including a $300 million block grant increase, $83 million CSAT increase, $91 million CSAP increase ($88 million plus a $3 million increase for CSAPs High Risk Youth Grants) and $162 million increase for NIDA.
While substance abuse advocates are supporting higher funding levels to help address the gap between needs and services, there is also a recognition that FY 00 funds will be tight and demands on them competitive. The entire substance abuse community is called upon to speak out for these programs.
Therapeutic Communities of America
Contact us: firstname.lastname@example.org
1601 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 803
Washington, D.C. 20009